The post I put up yesterday has more extensive analysis of US AID praising of exit polling in 14 cases abroad - it is the test they use for the fairness of elections. It also show the hidden reversal of what exit polling means - without commentary or as an unspoken assumption by the corporate media which all use the Edison group to do exit polling at primaries (I reprint some of the 2015 Edison Report to show this). Exit polling is the check on stolen elections, coming from talking to actual voters in multiple random samples as they leave the voting booth. What Edison does - in the United States, only - is to phony up so-called exit polls based on the reports of machines that leave no paper trail. That is, in a reversal, they use pseudo-polls to license theft (when the claimed result is way outside the Margin of Error as in New York below). The article below by Spencer Gundert adds further dimensions to the story and is worth reading.(h/t Paula Bard).
Gundert, however, does not realize how extensively Republicans have used machine voting to falsify elections for the Presidency and very likely, for the Senate and House. The Democratic leadership has never protested (I, among many others, have spent a lot of time urging this from below in Colorado in 2004, and in 2012, about Ohio - fortunately, headed off by a campaign led by Jill Stein of the Green Party).
The Clinton machine is thus part of high level "bipartisan" fraud over a period of time. And the claim that Hillary "doesn't get it" is belied by the fact that she was Secretary of State under Barack Obama, employing exit poll data to test the fairness of other countries' elections...Nonetheless, Gundert's article is important.
Hillary Clinton and Electoral Fraud
Why it is 99.9% certain electoral fraud was committed for Hillary Clinton
How to Rig an Election
“Far too many states use unreliable and insecure electronic voting machines, and many states have made their situation worse by adding some forms of Internet voting for some voters, which cannot be checked for accuracy at all. Even in states where verifiable systems are used, too often the check on the voting system’s function and accuracy is not done.”
“If you have exit polling data that is significantly off from the vote, then [the election’s] probably hacked.”
Exit Polls: Why They Have Been Significantly Off
“Over the past decades, exit polling has evolved into an exact science. Indeed, among pollsters and statisticians, such surveys are thought to be the most reliable…Exit polls in Germany, for example, have never missed the mark by more than three-tenths of one percent. ‘Exit polls are almost never wrong,’ Dick Morris, a political consultant who has worked for both Republicans and Democrats, noted after the 2004 vote. Such surveys are ‘so reliable,’ he added, ‘that they are used as guides to the relative honesty of elections in Third World countries.’ In 2003, vote tampering revealed by exit polling in the Republic of Georgia forced Eduard Shevardnadze to step down. And in November 2004, exit polling in the Ukraine — paid for by the Bush administration — exposed election fraud that denied Viktor Yushchenko the presidency.” — Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
How Voter Suppression Proves Electoral Fraud
“We really are the only advanced democracy on Earth that systematically and purposely makes it really hard for people to vote…We sort of just assume, yeah, that’s I guess how it is. There’s no other country on Earth that does that.” — President Barack Obama, April 2016
“Speaking as a database guy, one could hypothetically pull a list of names from the voter file that had indicated they were ‘strongly in support’ of Bernie Sanders, and write a script to update only their party affiliation. This might be the work of about an hour.”
“I’ve had reports from at least a dozen friends, family members, and friends of friends in other areas who have been switched. All Bernie supporters: I have yet to hear of this happening to a Clinton supporter.”