Saturday, March 17, 2012

Man shoots teenager and goes scot-free

A gated community. A vigilante in an SUV follows a young man in a hood after dark. The grown man is an adult, weighing 100 pounds more than the young man. The grown man calls the police, but is told to stay away from the young man. The car screeches behind the young man, the grown man gets out, screams loud and threatening things to the young man, they scuffle, the grown man goes down, blood on his face.

The young man screams for help. The grown man murders him with a gun...

The young man is white. The vigilante is black.

The grown man is arrested immediately and in jail, awaiting trial for murder.

But Trayvon Martin was black...

The aggressor - the racist - was white.

The police department protects the racist. The case reeks so badly it is (to its credit) in the New York Times this morning.

What the story does not include are the facts about the prison and injustice system revealed by Michelle Alexander's The New Jim Crow and a wave of important writings on the prison/probation complex. The US holds 2.3 million people in prison, 25% of the world's prisoners, more than China, Russia and the remaining dictatorships of the Middle East (including the Israeli dictatorship over the Occupied Territories) combined. Many of those imprisoned are black and chicano. According to the Justice Department, 1 in every 3 black males born in 2001 can expect to go to prison, 1 in 6 chicanos and 1 in 17 whites. Even the number for whites is enormous, both as compared to civilized countries and as an absolute; the racism of these figures - and how it hurts whites as well - is unspeakable. See here.

There is no self-defense reasonably to be claimed for someone in an SUV following a young man with skittles and ice tea walking in a gated community in the wrong clothes (a hooded jacked). Trayvon Martin committed the offense of walking while black and was murdered for it.

He did stand up to the aggressor and initially perhaps fought him off. What the aggressor screamed at Trayvon is not yet a matter of public record, but it is hard not to be sympathetic to Trayvon in the situation (George Zimmerman is a big man, a bully and a coward, whose "strength" dissolved into his gun...).

In a state with a legal system (not Florida), a defense lawyer might want to consider paranoid insanity.

But of course, what the police did here in letting the white man walk is part of a deep pattern of injustice - or police state activity - driven by the American South but upheld by the Democrats as well. It a pattern which creates mass jailing of young people largely for drug "crimes" (better than half of the eight-fold increase of imprisonments since the 1970s, has been for drug crimes, 4/5ths of these for possession of marijuana).

Zimmerman, as his father said, is part chicano. But unlike the chicanos who can expect to spend time in prison, he was here temporarily made an honorary "white." This is the reality in America, 2012...

Maintenance of law requires that Martin be arrested and the facts aired in a court. He could be punished for the crime (though capital punishment is an act of barbarity, also misapplied in a racist way - see here, here, here and here on Troy Davis). But honoring the law equally is only a way to discourage crime. Trayvon Martin can never live out his life.

The community could be healed by truth and reconciliation. But in the America of 2012, this is not yet a possibility...

What Charles Blow speaks of as a "salve" (the punishment of a criminal) can never heal what is gone.

The Curious Case of Trayvon Martin
Published: March 16, 2012

“He said that Tray was gone.”

That’s how Sybrina Fulton, her voice full of ache, told me she found out that her 17-year-old son, Trayvon Martin, had died. In a wrenching telephone call, the boy’s father, who had taken him to visit a friend, told her that Trayvon had been gunned down in a gated townhouse community in Sanford, Fla., outside Orlando.

“He said, ‘Somebody shot Trayvon and killed him.’ And I was like, ‘Are you sure?’ ” Fulton continued in disbelief. “I said ‘How do you know that’s Trayvon?’ And he said because they showed him a picture.”

That was Feb. 27, one day after Trayvon was shot. The father thought that he was missing, according to the family’s lawyer, Benjamin Crump, but the boy’s body had actually been taken to the medical examiner’s office and listed as a John Doe.

The father called the Missing Persons Unit. No luck. Then he called 911. The police asked the father to describe the boy, after which they sent officers to the house where the father was staying. There they showed him a picture of the boy with blood coming out of his mouth.

This is a nightmare scenario for any parent, and the events leading to Trayvon’s death offer little comfort — and pose many questions.

Trayvon had left the house he and his father were visiting to walk to the local 7-Eleven. On his way back, he caught the attention of George Zimmerman, a 28-year-old neighborhood watch captain, who was in a sport-utility vehicle. Zimmerman called the police because the boy looked “real suspicious,” according to a 911 call released late Friday. The operator told Zimmerman that officers were being dispatched and not to pursue the boy.

Zimmerman apparently pursued him anyway, at some point getting out of his car and confronting the boy. Trayvon had a bag of Skittles and a can of iced tea. Zimmerman had a 9 millimeter handgun.

The two allegedly engaged in a physical altercation. There was yelling, and then a gunshot.

When police arrived, Trayvon was face down in the grass with a fatal bullet wound to the chest. Zimmerman was standing with blood on his face and the back of his head and grass stains on his back, according to The Orlando Sentinel.

Trayvon’s lifeless body was taken away, tagged and held. Zimmerman was taken into custody, questioned and released. Zimmerman said he was the one yelling for help. He said that he acted in self-defense. The police say that they have found no evidence to dispute Zimmerman’s claim.

One other point: Trayvon is black. Zimmerman is not.

Trayvon was buried on March 3. Zimmerman is still free and has not been arrested or charged with a crime.

Yet the questions remain: Why did Zimmerman find Trayvon suspicious? Why did he pursue the boy when the 911 operator instructed him not to? Why did he get out of the car, and why did he take his gun when he did? How is it self-defense when you are the one in pursuit? Who initiated the altercation? Who cried for help? Did Trayvon’s body show evidence of a struggle? What moved Zimmerman to use lethal force?

This case has reignited a furor about vigilante justice, racial-profiling and equitable treatment under the law, and it has stirred the pot of racial strife.

As the father of two black teenage boys, this case hits close to home. This is the fear that seizes me whenever my boys are out in the world: that a man with a gun and an itchy finger will find them “suspicious.” That passions may run hot and blood run cold. That it might all end with a hole in their chest and hole in my heart. That the law might prove insufficient to salve my loss.

That is the burden of black boys in America and the people that love them: running the risk of being descended upon in the dark and caught in the cross-hairs of someone who crosses the line.

The racial sensitivity of this case is heavy. Trayvon’s parents have said their son was murdered. Crump, the family’s lawyer, told me, “You know, if Trayvon would have been the triggerman, it’s nothing Trayvon Martin could have said to keep police from arresting him Day 1, Hour 1.” Even the police chief recognizes this reality, even while disputing claims of racial bias in the investigation: “Our investigation is color blind and based on the facts and circumstances, not color. I know I can say that until I am blue in the face, but, as a white man in a uniform, I know it doesn’t mean anything to anybody.”

Zimmerman has not released a statement, but his father delivered a one-page letter to The Orlando Sentinel on Thursday. According to the newspaper, the statement said that Zimmerman is “Hispanic and grew up in a multiracial family.” The paper quotes the letter as reading, “He would be the last to discriminate for any reason whatsoever” and continues, “The media portrayal of George as a racist could not be further from the truth.” And disclosures made since the shooting complicate people’s perception of fairness in the case.

According to Crump, the father was told that one of the reasons Zimmerman wasn’t arrested was because he had a “squeaky clean” record. It wasn’t. According to the local news station WFTV, Zimmerman was arrested in 2005 for “battery on a law enforcement officer.”

Furthermore, ABC News reported on Tuesday that one of the responding officers “corrected a witness after she told him that she heard the teen cry for help.” And The Miami Herald published an article on Thursday that said three witnesses had heard the “desperate wail of a child, a gunshot, and then silence.”

WFTV also reported this week that the officer in charge of the scene when Trayvon was shot was also in charge of another controversial case. In 2010, a lieutenant’s son was videotaped attacking a black homeless man. The officer’s son also was not initially arrested in that case. He was later arrested when the television station broke the news.

Although we must wait to get the results from all the investigations into Trayvon’s killing, it is clear that it is a tragedy. If no wrongdoing of any sort is ascribed to the incident, it will be an even greater tragedy.

One of the witnesses was a 13-year-old black boy who recorded a video for The Orlando Sentinel recounting what he saw. The boy is wearing a striped polo shirt, holding a microphone, speaking low and deliberately and has the heavy look of worry and sadness in his eyes. He describes hearing screaming, seeing someone on the ground and hearing gunshots. The video ends with the boy saying, “I just think that sometimes people get stereotyped, and I fit into the stereotype as the person who got shot.”

And that is the burden of black boys, and this case can either ease or exacerbate.

See here for the Times's news story on the case, and here on the new generation of racist "stand your ground" laws.

No comments:

Post a Comment